Chapter 3 discusses different ways to frame
dialogic ethics and approaches to communication ethics. These are theoretical approaches and they help
us u understand the “sense” of the good that each approach ask us to protect
and promote (44).I got stuck with the Contextual
Communication ethics approach that is recognizing variations in culture,
persons and communication setting when applying communication ethics
principles, protecting and promoting the good of the particular context and the
good residing in that context (51). This approach asks questions about the
situation of the determined and is looking to find the good appropriate for
that individual case.
It
brings up the example about differences in appropriateness of eye contact
across cultures, that it can mean different things in different culture. These may be something that an organisation
and business need to think of with their employees and emphasise when having
employees across different cultures. I
think this approach brings up a lot of things that I have experienced coming
from a different culture and things that I think is important to emphasize in a
lot of cases. A simply thing like saying “hi how are you” and being polite to strangers here in the U.S. Is where I come from almost rude and not as appropriate as it might be here. It is something I had to adjust to when moving here since people often got very intimidated about how I acted socially. Once again, communication ethics teach us to understand that there different goods and that they can vary across cultures and that we have different ways to perceive the world.
I enjoy your example of appropriateness of eye contact for various cultures. I travel quite a bit and I have noted this is from other countries I have visited. I think being in communications and working with countless people in other cultures this is an important aspect to acknowledge.
ReplyDelete