In chapter 4, common sense is defined as “a
by-product of what we know and what we practice.”(page 63) We would be judged
by others based on what they think is common. Aristotele expected speaker and
audiences shares enough common sense so that speaker don’t need to state what
it is. The difficult thing is that common is fluid, so common sense existing
today would not be shared anymore ten years after from today. Also, common sense
in the United States would not be same in other countries because it seems to
have universal appeal, but it is recognized among certain groups.
I believe common sense could work both in
good way and bad way. As Aristotele suggested, common sense makes our life
easier by giving us what is expected in the society without explanation. It
helps us to keep the public order. Almost everyone knows what would be happened
when we drop a glass on the floor. On the other hand, we sometimes can’t
understand others’ behavior and blame for lack of knowledge. Common sense can
tie our mind and keep us from creating new decisions. In addition, it can make
in-group and out-group environment with own standards and generalization.
The phrase “It is common sense!” would make
people confused and sometimes irritated since it can mean you are not educated
or don’t have knowledge. In intercultural class I’m currently taking, we were
taught our value is varied by many groups such as gender and heritage. For
example, common sense of proximity is different from Japan and the United
States. Japanese people do not give a hug for their family, so it is weird for
them to hug with family with their common sense. It requires to learn common
sense in order to adjust other culture.
No comments:
Post a Comment