In chapter 5, the textbook explains how
dialogic ethics important to us to have healthy and effective
communication. I strongly agree
with Freire’s idea that “A dialogic communication ethic assists the Other, saving
face in order to protect and promote an environment of learning.”(87) Since
dialogic ethics requires at least two people through communication, it is
important to what we are supposed to know about the Others. Since they have
different background and values from us, it is better to have prior knowledge
about them. The textbook said, “Taking communication ethics into a dialogic
perspective requires meeting and understanding various communication contexts
and applications.”(94) I believe that openness to correction is important through
communication.
In order to learn new perspectives or ideas
from dialogue, we should be open-minded to understand others. Which does not
mean that we need to absorb what others say and think, but we need to negotiate
differences. We learn from differences more than similarities, so negotiating
difference is key to have successful learning circumstance. At the same time,
the Other is also trying to learn from you, so discuss your opinion as clear as
possible. It would be difficult for us because we tend to communicate via
social network services. Since I cannot see my friends face while we are exchanging
our ideas on smartphone, it is sometimes difficult to understand if she understands
what I’m trying to say. Face to face communication would be more effective to
apply dialogic ethics rather than text messages.
I agree with your comment about prior knowledge of people we communicate helping with understanding the possible differences they may have from us. This makes finding a common ground of communicative ethics a lot easier. Page 81 explains that dialogue opens the door for other persons and ideas in order to learn through differences.
ReplyDeleteI agree with your comment about it being more difficult to to apply dialogic ethics through text as opposed to face to face contact. Hannah Arendt explained that natural dialectic of public and private life both offer different textured responses (pg.88). This suggest that the environment that one is in has an effect in how they respond to certain dialogues.