The book defines interpersonal communication ethics as an "attentive concern for relationship between persons" (p.119). It is the only form of communication ethics that solely focuses on the good of personal relationships. A few praxis of interpersonal communication are also introduced, including the concepts of distance and interpersonal responsibility. Distance is the necessary space for contribution by each member of the relationship, while interpersonal responsibility starts with a commitment to active care of the relationship (p.121). The level of these two aspects of interpersonal communication can very and fluctuate between relationships, often creating relationships of different strength and commitment.
Personal relationships with friends greatly depict the aspects of interpersonal communication as well. My strongest friendships include a minimized distance, as well as a solid commitment to responsibility in the relationship. The more you spend time with new friends, the closer your distance becomes. You are more comfortable with talking to them about practically anything that you may be thinking about. A good friendship also requires commitment and care for the actual friendship itself. If there is not a good amount of commitment, the overall distance among friends can become larger, making it more difficult to have meaning conversation, and the friendship becomes weak. This concept can also apply to co-workers and classmates as well, it comes with being around people often and constantly interacting with one another.
Your example created a clear understanding of the aspects of interpersonal communication. The praxis of distance in interpersonal communication ethics is necessary aspect for each partner in the relationship to contribute equally. What other variables in communication ethics would affect contributing to the relationship in regards to distance? Relating back to the definition of interpersonal communication, “the good of the relationship between and among a small number of people (2-4)” how does distance play a role in nourishing the relationship? I think to nourish a relationship in regards to distance, requires both parties to acknowledge the distance between the individuals and make an effort to be accountable to the relationship.
ReplyDeleteYou mention that your strongest friendships today are ones that include minimized distance, and responsibility in the relationship. I agree that more than often our strongest friendships are the ones with those who live nearby or a even short distance away. However, is it possible to remain close with some of your closest friends with the use of technology and social media- if the person is no longer in the same location? How would you commit to a long distance relationship if both of you agreed to remain committed?
Austin,
ReplyDeleteThe praxis for distance is certainly an important aspect in any relationship, and yes both members still need to contribute and make the relationship work. I'm the opposite of you my strongest relationship actually have a longer distance but it's because all my close friends live overseas. I also believe that it is easier to commit to long distance relationships today because of our technology and social media, I don't think my own relationships would be as strong as they are without it.